<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista less secure than XP.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/</link>
	<description>me = entrepreneur + hacker;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carlmercier.com/?p=69#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Max,

I understand your point.  Try Vista and you&#039;ll see how annoying it is and how often you&#039;re asked: Allow or Deny?  Without a doubt, you&#039;ll quickly start clicking &quot;Allow&quot; all the time without even reading the message.  That&#039;s what &quot;regular&quot; users do, anyway, especially since they don&#039;t understand the risks.

That&#039;s a serious usability and design flaw in my opinion.  One of the many Vista flaws.  By designing Vista this way, they are passing on the security blame to the users while they should have fixed security for real and for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max,</p>
<p>I understand your point.  Try Vista and you&#8217;ll see how annoying it is and how often you&#8217;re asked: Allow or Deny?  Without a doubt, you&#8217;ll quickly start clicking &#8220;Allow&#8221; all the time without even reading the message.  That&#8217;s what &#8220;regular&#8221; users do, anyway, especially since they don&#8217;t understand the risks.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a serious usability and design flaw in my opinion.  One of the many Vista flaws.  By designing Vista this way, they are passing on the security blame to the users while they should have fixed security for real and for good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carlmercier.com/?p=69#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Sorry Carl, but you can&#039;t really say that it&#039;s less secure if the people actually *turn off* the security feature.

I&#039;m more at risk if I don&#039;t wear the seatbelt in my car, and some find it very annoying. Still, it&#039;s not the manufacturer&#039;s mistake if you die in a crash and you&#039;re not wearing it.

I haven&#039;t used Vista yet though, so I can&#039;t really comment on the &quot;annoyingness&quot; (if that&#039;s a word).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Carl, but you can&#8217;t really say that it&#8217;s less secure if the people actually *turn off* the security feature.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more at risk if I don&#8217;t wear the seatbelt in my car, and some find it very annoying. Still, it&#8217;s not the manufacturer&#8217;s mistake if you die in a crash and you&#8217;re not wearing it.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t used Vista yet though, so I can&#8217;t really comment on the &#8220;annoyingness&#8221; (if that&#8217;s a word).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carlmercier.com/?p=69#comment-707</guid>
		<description>I do have a Mac.  I&#039;m sticking with XP in Parallels.  I installed Vista on some relatives computers, but they hated it so much that I had to reinstall XP.  Not only they hated it, but it was incompatible with a lot of software/hardware they had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do have a Mac.  I&#8217;m sticking with XP in Parallels.  I installed Vista on some relatives computers, but they hated it so much that I had to reinstall XP.  Not only they hated it, but it was incompatible with a lot of software/hardware they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heri</title>
		<link>http://blog.carlmercier.com/2007/03/19/vista-less-secure-than-xp/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>heri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 14:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.carlmercier.com/?p=69#comment-706</guid>
		<description>I thought you had a mac? or do you have paralles with vista installed on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you had a mac? or do you have paralles with vista installed on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

